vvvexation: (Default)
vvvexation ([personal profile] vvvexation) wrote2009-11-30 07:18 pm

...and his gratuitous charm

I...am not sure what to make of this vocabulary-building tool.

I mean, I suppose, all other things being equal, it's probably a useful thing to have in existence. But the fact that there's actually a market for this...

...yeah, I dunno, man.

[identity profile] nasu-dengaku.livejournal.com 2009-12-01 07:10 am (UTC)(link)
From a cognitive psychology perspective, it's an excellent way to learn vocab if you're a Twilight fan.

I would be amused if they took this a step further and published a version of Twilight where more long SAT words had been added. Better yet, it could be an e-book with hyperlinks to the word definitions. Even better still, the text could swap in synonyms dynamically so as to allow a good learning curve like a well-done video game or personal trainer would do.

[identity profile] vvvexation.livejournal.com 2009-12-01 07:14 am (UTC)(link)
Ooh. So how would the synonym-swapping actually work--I mean, how would the book determine what level to start you off at and when to move you up a notch? Would it depend on how many times you clicked over to read the definitions? I can see that backfiring in the case of a compulsive reader like me--I'd be likely to read the definitions even of words I already knew.

[identity profile] nasu-dengaku.livejournal.com 2009-12-01 07:20 am (UTC)(link)
I was thinking at the number of times people click on definitions as an indicator. Even you'd get bored of reading them, right?

However, you could also do it with end-of-chapter quizzes.

[identity profile] vvvexation.livejournal.com 2009-12-01 07:23 am (UTC)(link)
Quizzes might be a better way to go. Then again, this whole scheme seems to rely on frequent rereading, and I'm not sure how often most people reread most books, but I suspect it's not all that often. D'you reckon the reread stats are significantly greater for books like Twilight?

[identity profile] nasu-dengaku.livejournal.com 2009-12-01 07:24 am (UTC)(link)
If I were a Twilight fan and I was choosing between rereading Twilight and memorizing a giant word list, the book would look very appealaing.

[identity profile] vvvexation.livejournal.com 2009-12-01 07:45 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, but that assumes your goal is to learn vocabulary. Now if you were choosing between rereading Twilight, memorizing a giant word list, and going to the mall....

[identity profile] nasu-dengaku.livejournal.com 2009-12-01 07:47 am (UTC)(link)
Oooh.... reframing. You win.

[identity profile] vvvexation.livejournal.com 2009-12-01 08:05 am (UTC)(link)
Heh. I'm not saying the ebook wouldn't work for those who were trying to learn vocabulary--i.e. the people the Cliff's Notes guide is aimed at. But then again, given the existence of said Cliff's Notes guide to accompany one's probably-already-purchased copy of Twilight, the ebook would have to be pretty cheap to compete.

[identity profile] plymouth.livejournal.com 2009-12-01 08:40 am (UTC)(link)
When I was in junior high I read Dragonflight and Dragonquest 7 times. I stopped halfway through The White Dragon on the 7th read. So, um, yeah.

[identity profile] vvvexation.livejournal.com 2009-12-01 08:46 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, I'm sure there are books I've read that often. But you and I are surely not typical.