Minesweeper, the game as usually played, is not NP complete.
The "minesweeper consistency problem" is, apparently.
The two are entirely different beasts. When one plays minesweeper, one assumes that the game is internally consistent and that you won't have to solve the consistency problem; in fact if one encounters evidence that the game is NOT consistent, one usually stops playing in disgust.
Likewise, my [arbitrary problem that's provably NOT NP-complete] software runs on a computer that performs computations using the same underlying boolean logic elements. That doesn't make my software NP-complete, either.
I appear to have been outgeeked, or at least out-nitpicked.
Thank you! I now realize that there are a large number of people who equate the two, to one degree or another, and I've been confused on a number of occasions because they do and I don't, and didn't know what I didn't know.
Ok, Captain Morgan probably has something to do with it, if that makes no sense.
no subject
Minesweeper, the game as usually played, is not NP complete.
The "minesweeper consistency problem" is, apparently.
The two are entirely different beasts. When one plays minesweeper, one assumes that the game is internally consistent and that you won't have to solve the consistency problem; in fact if one encounters evidence that the game is NOT consistent, one usually stops playing in disgust.
Likewise, my [arbitrary problem that's provably NOT NP-complete] software runs on a computer that performs computations using the same underlying boolean logic elements. That doesn't make my software NP-complete, either.
no subject
no subject
Thank you! I now realize that there are a large number of people who equate the two, to one degree or another, and I've been confused on a number of occasions because they do and I don't, and didn't know what I didn't know.
Ok, Captain Morgan probably has something to do with it, if that makes no sense.
no subject
We are enlightened! Yay!