ext_18431 ([identity profile] vvvexation.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] vvvexation 2004-09-29 06:28 am (UTC)

Hmmm. Well, since the same is true of "be" in that context, there may just be a glitch in the definition of copulative verbs.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting