My problem, as I repeatedly stated, is not that her definitions are not in accordance with my own, but that she thinks her definitions are the only correct ones--she is the one who would presumably have a problem with my definitions. And I do not think that is a minor detail; it represents a closed-minded worldview which, taken as a whole, ought to make anyone angry. You yourself certainly don't seem to think closed-mindedness isn't worth getting upset about, since you've taken the trouble to accuse me of being hypocritical about it.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2005-08-25 05:58 pm (UTC)My problem, as I repeatedly stated, is not that her definitions are not in accordance with my own, but that she thinks her definitions are the only correct ones--she is the one who would presumably have a problem with my definitions. And I do not think that is a minor detail; it represents a closed-minded worldview which, taken as a whole, ought to make anyone angry. You yourself certainly don't seem to think closed-mindedness isn't worth getting upset about, since you've taken the trouble to accuse me of being hypocritical about it.