vvvexation: (Default)
[personal profile] vvvexation
I've mostly figured out how I'm voting on Tuesday, but I'm still undecided on Props. 1A, 61, and 63. Anyone want to argue me into a position on those?

Date: 2004-11-01 12:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] japlady.livejournal.com
thing is, its 1% + 1% + 1%, etc

Date: 2004-11-01 01:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] capnkjb.livejournal.com
Well, yes, in terms of John Millionaire + Jane Billionaire + Tim BigBucks, etc.

If you mean it's another 1% tax on rich people that would be the proverbial straw on the camel's back, well, that I'm not so sure of.

Date: 2004-11-01 01:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] japlady.livejournal.com
There's also the issue of, when you only tax the rich, your tieing the funds in that account to the stock market in effect... thats great as long as the economy is robust, but when things go wonky the money dries up.

Date: 2004-11-01 01:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] capnkjb.livejournal.com
There's that. But there are going to be bigger problems than just mental health funding if the stock market tanks. An alternate funding source would be similarly screwed with a wonky market (and economy).

Profile

vvvexation: (Default)
vvvexation

September 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526 272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 01:11 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios